设为首页收藏本站|繁體中文

中国壶迷

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
热搜: 紫砂 宜兴
查看: 1480|回复: 3

学者对老壶不负责任.......

[复制链接]
发表于 2017-11-21 12:57:05 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?注册

x

帖子的最近访客查看更多↓

 楼主| 发表于 2017-11-21 12:58:40 | 显示全部楼层
HUANG QIAN LIANG’S LAST PARTING WORDS WERE SO SHOCKING, IRRESPONSIBLE AND DAMAGING TO HIS REPUTATION………………………………………………………………….
In 2011, after we showed Huang Qian Liang 10 pots and out of that 6 pots he guessed the Niandes awfully wrong; we sold him 3 pots before we told him we have archaeological material and records pertaining to all our pots(.(Zisha and Santoh).
We showed Huang Qian Liang 10 pots to hear his professional opinion.

We sold him 3 pots to see how he values our pots.
And finally, we surprised Huang Qian Liang with our archaeological material and information to see his reaction.
This was our clever strategy to break open and see what’s inside the mind of this very well-known scholar and know what sort of a person he is.
The first part of the strategy was to find out if he really is a scholar and knows his subject.. namely  old Zisha hu.
We showed him 10 old Zisha hus of which 6 pots he guessed the Niandes very incorrectly( his  mistakes stretches, sometimes, to as many as 5 Niandes off the mark).To make matter worst and embarrassing but unknown to him that we know the exact dating of the pot, Huang Qian Liang added that he can issue Certificate of Authenticity for a fee of RMB2,000( like the going rate on mainland China at that time, 2011)
Result of finding: We found out that Huang Qian Liang is not a real scholar in the true sense of the word and we discovered he is willing to sacrifice truth by pretending to really know old Zisha hu and profiteer through deception.
The second part of the strategy was to find out whether Huang Qian Liang knows the value of our pots.
We sold him 3 rare early Qing Zhuni hus. An impatient, hen-pecked Huang Qian Liang  was joined by his excited, domineering wife and together they lectured us about our 3 rare early Qing Zhuni hus. This was what they said: Your 3 pots are very common and cheap in mainland China. Very few people like to collect early Qing Zhuni hus, especially unearthed pots and their prices are dropping every day in China. Put it another way, what Huang Qian liang implied was that Ren Fu Collections was very lucky that somebody like him wanted to buy our pots.
But their claims was belied by their excitement, impatience and eagerness to buy our pots because if our pots are so common, so plentiful and so cheap in mainland China why are they so desperate and anxious to get hold of our pots which we know are rare early Qing Zhuni hus and very valuable.
Result of finding: We found out that Huang Qian Liang  is more of a cunning ,lying, opportunistic businessman, and nothing of a scholar, who would distort facts to get what he wants. We noticed that Huang Qian Liang and his wife (whatever her name?) extremely values our 3 rare early Qing Zhuni hus but claimed the opposite to devalue our 3 pots…a cheap reverse psychology.
The third and last part of the strategy was to find out the integrity of Huang Qian Liang who called himself a true scholar.
We surprised Huang Qian Liang by showing him rare archaeological pictures of tombstone epitaphs and (In the ground) Pre-Disturbance Phase pictures of excavated pots..or archaeological proofs if you like. Shockingly and strangely for a scholar like Huang Qian Liang who previously lamented the lack of valuable archaeological excavations as one of the main cause of the chaos in old Zisha hu, he was not , even in the least bit interested in archaeological material or proofs.
Now what Huang Qian Liang said to us concerning the archaeological proofs we showed him-this is what is going to shock you. This was what he said, “I am not interested in archaeological excavations or proofs but do you have more early Qing Zhuni hus to sell?”(Well, he did later say he will ask Palace Museum of Taiwan if they are interested)
Result of finding: We found out that Huang Qian Liang , the well known scholar and a member of the panel of experts in Palace Museum, is a very corrupted person who would not hesitate to sacrifice truth in exchange for profit and fame( This sad situation of Huang Qian Liang is the legacy, some say scourge and curse from the Taiwanese fraudsters’ world)
Something else too we would like to address about what people criticize Huang Qian Liang about is true and that is Huang Qian Liang plagiarizes a lot of material written by other old Zisha hu experts and make them his own …and almost none of his hypothesis on old Zisha hu is based on archaeological excavations or proofs.
A very sad and sorrowful old Zisha hu world ,indeed, to get such a scholar who should be saving and protecting old Zisha hu but instead he exploits old Zisha hu’s  weakness for his own monetary gains.
Enjoy Ren Fu Collections’ historical “One Belt, One Road” archaeological posting.
P/s…When Tony Ren returned to Malaysia, where he is based, Huang Qian Liang on realizing his mistakes and unprofessional behavior and on gaining his composure, wrote an e-mail to us in a very responsible and respectable manner proposing the possibility that he will take up the matter with the relevant museum.
Just before we clicked off, do you all know Huang Qian Liang once pleaded with us not to attack him in an e-mail?( We still have that e-mail for proof)
Appended are proofs of e-mails Huang Qian Liang sent to us after we returned to Malaysia.
黄健亮最后见面的话是如此的令人震惊的、不负责任和损害他的名誉...........
2011年,给黄健亮10把壶,6把壶他猜到了年代,我们卖给他3把壶,我们告诉他我们有考古材料和记录有关我们所有的壶(紫砂壶和汕头壶)。
我们给黄健亮看了10把壶听他的专业意见。

我们卖给他3把早清壶看看他是如何评价我们的壶?
最后,我们用考古材料和信息让黄健亮吃惊,看看他的反应。
这是我们聪明的策略,让我们了解这位著名学者的思想,知道他是什么样的人。
策略的第一部分是弄清楚他是否真的是一个学者,了解他的专业即老紫砂壶。
我们发现他看10把老壶,但是其中6把壶是猜错年代(猜测错误相差5个年代很离谱)
。使事情更糟糕,尴尬因为他不知道我们知道确切的年代,黄健亮说:“可以出一个2000元人民币的老壶鉴定证书”(在2011年)。
结果发现:我们发现黄健亮并不是真正意义上的一个学者,我们发现他假装知道老紫砂壶和不管真理,因为要欺骗和奸商老紫砂壶一起合作为到赚钱。(不知道现在他还敢为人出鉴定书吗?)
战略的第二部分是要弄清楚黄健亮是否知道我们的老壶价值。
我们卖给他3把罕见的早清朱泥壶。一个着急的不耐烦的太太,霸气要管事的太太和他们一起和我交流着这3把罕见的清初朱泥壶。这是他们这样说:你在中国大陆的这些壶是很普通的,很便宜,很少有人喜欢收集清初朱泥壶 ,尤其是出土的紫砂壶和他们的价格在中国大陆掉下来了。换句话说,黄健亮暗示任富收藏很幸运,有他这样的人想买我们的壶。
如果我们的壶都是如此普遍,如此丰富,如此便宜在中国大陆,为什么如此绝望和渴望得到我们的老壶,我们知道是罕见的清初朱泥壶和非常有价值的。但他们的要求是违背了他们的激动、急躁和渴望购买我们的壶。
结果发现:黄健亮更像是一个狡猾的、撒谎的、机会主义的商人,而不是一个学者,他歪曲事实以得到自己想要的东西。我们注意到黄健亮和他的妻子(不管她叫什么名字)?这3把罕见的早清朱泥壶却被他们贬低这些国宝紫砂壶,目的是想让便宜卖给他们相对是逆反心理,他们倒过来讲话的目的你们可以想象)。
第三个也是最后一个部分是要找出黄健亮的诚实正直,他自称是真正的学者,这是真的吗?
我们惊讶地给黄健亮看难得的墓碑墓志铭显示他罕见的考古图片(在地上)前照片,考古发掘的壶和证明。令人震惊的奇怪的是一个学者如黄健亮曾感叹宝贵的考古发掘的资料很重要和不够使用,在这个混乱的老紫砂壶世界。最主要原因,他没有一点点感兴趣我们的考古资料和记录材料。
现在你们会不相信和震惊跳一下,告诉我们的考古证据和资料记录,这是他所说的:“我不是在考古发掘或证明感兴趣,但你还有更多早清壶要卖给我吗?”(他后来说他会问台湾故宫博物馆,是否感兴趣)
结果发现:我们发现黄健亮著名的学者,在故宫专家小组的一员,是一个非常腐败的人,会毫不犹豫地牺牲真理,只管利润和声誉(黄健亮这个局面是遗留下来的,有的人说是像台湾骗子的世界一样)。
还有其他一些事我们想提,有人批评黄健亮偷抄袭别人很多的资料,讲是他写的…..我们知道他是骗的,我们几乎很少看见他写的老紫砂壶故事有考古证据。
一个很悲哀和伤心老紫砂壶世界,事实上,应该有好的学者和救到老紫砂壶,不应该有像黄健亮这样一个学者来诈骗和谋利。
享受任富收藏的历史“一带一路”考古发贴。
P/S: 当Tony Ren回到马来西亚的时候,我们感觉黄健亮意识到自己的错误和不专业的行为,并逐渐镇定下来。收到了黄健亮的一个电子邮件:“他会和台北博物馆引进我们考古的事情,看他们是否感兴趣这些考古资料吗?”
我们还没结束,有一个好笑的事情给你们讲:“有一次他要求我们不要再攻击他了可以吗?”
发表于 2017-11-28 19:40:07 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2017-11-28 22:00:21 | 显示全部楼层
壶迷论坛以壶论壶,你的壶贴上来让大家评判,各人都会有不同的评述,这很正常。你对壶的理解也不是完全正确的,所以不能把自己的理解强加于人!我们是评壶不是评人!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

QQ|申请友链|小黑屋|Archiver|手机版|图片缩放助手下载|中国壶迷 ( 浙ICP备14004459号-4 公安备案105031|105258|人工智能   

GMT+8, 2018-1-19 21:18 , Processed in 0.197858 second(s), 49 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表